In a development that’s sending shockwaves through Hollywood and the music world, Offset has reportedly filed a legal claim seeking custody of all four of Cardi B’s children — including the newborn she recently had with NFL star Stefon Diggs. According to multiple social-media posts circulating online, the filing also demands $200 million in emotional damages…
What’s Being Claimed
- The custody claim reportedly covers all of Cardi B’s children — her three with Offset, plus the new baby with Stefon Diggs. Instagram+1
- Alongside custody, Offset’s petition allegedly demands a staggering $200 million in emotional damages. Instagram+1
- The move far exceeds prior filings: in early to mid-2025, legal documents showed Offset requesting joint
custody of the three children he shares with Cardi B, and joint responsibility for legal/child-support matters. E! Online+2St. Louis American+2
Context: Why This Story Has Erupted
The backdrop to this bombshell filing involves a tangled web of relationships and public drama:
- Cardi B and Offset — once married — began divorce proceedings in mid-2024 after years of a tumultuous relationship. The Economic Times+2Wikipedia+2
- Meanwhile, Cardi B has publicly confirmed a relationship with Stefon Diggs, and in Fall 2025, she gave birth to their son — her fourth child overall. Newsweek+2¡HOLA!+2
- Shortly after the birth, Offset sparked controversy by posting (and then deleting) an Instagram Story that read “My kid lol,” seemingly alluding to the newborn. Media outlets at the time described the post as a “shocking message.” Page Six+1
- The new custody-and-damages claim appears to escalate things dramatically — pushing the dispute beyond separation, into a full-fledged custody war that reportedly now includes a demand for massive financial compensation.
class="wp-block-heading">The Fallout: Reputation, Relationships, and Legal Complexity
This filing — if legitimate — could have far-reaching consequences:
- For Cardi B: The demand threatens to shake up ongoing custody and co-parenting plans, while also reopening wounds in her personal life.
- For Offset: The move could be seen by some as a bold assertion of rights — but by others as sensational, vindictive, or even exploitative. Either way, it sends a message.
- For Stefon Diggs: While not directly named in the purported filing summaries, the inclusion of the newborn connects him publicly to a volatile custody/legal battle — potentially complicating his own life and reputation.
- Public perception: Fans and media may view this either as a dramatic but justified attempt at fairness, or as an unnecessarily aggressive, attention-grabbing strategy.
But — Is the Filing Verified?
At this point, the story appears to rely almost entirely on posts shared via social-media channels: Instagram reels, Facebook posts, and group posts. Facebook+2Instagram+2 The major entertainment outlets have not published independently verified reports confirming that a formal court filing exists containing such sweeping demands. Reputable platforms that cover celebrity law matters are not citing any verified court documents.
Media coverage from earlier in 2025 confirms only a standard custody petition seeking joint custody of their three children — nothing close to the kind of sweeping claim described in these social posts. St. Louis American+2Yahoo+2
Why This Matters — And What to Watch For
This situation raises big questions around:
- The role of social media: The reliance on Instagram/Facebook for major legal claims underscores how celebrity legal news is increasingly being driven by unverified leaks, rumors, and hype.
- Legal accountability vs. public spectacle: If indeed Offset is seeking $200 M, the demand likely serves as both a legal maneuver and a statement — whether or not it holds up in court.
- The stakes for the children involved: While custody and damages are legal constructs, the underlying reality affects real kids — their childhoods, family dynamics, and sense of stability.
- The pressure on all parties: From Cardi B to Diggs to Offset — navigating privacy, media scrutiny, family, and legal battles simultaneously.